July 29, 2009 Fine Line Between Fact & Fiction, open chat 2
The transcript below covers the complete #litchat conversation on July 29, 2009. The order appears sequentially from the first post to the final post. Topic was open discussion The Fine Line Between Fact and Fiction.
LitChat Welcome to #litchat. For the next hour we are discussing THE FINE LINE BETWEEN FACT & FICTION. Join us 4-5 p/et.July 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
maggiedana Hi, everyone. Looking forward to another lively session on #litchat. Monday’s chat was awesome and flew by way too fast. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
BenRubinstein @LitChat I don’t understand why people get angry over fact/fiction? Is there anyone who really cares? Good writing is good writing #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LitChat If you have questions about THE FINE LINE BETWEEN FACT & FICTION, please send to @litchat w/o hashtag so l can post to #litchat.July 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LitChat Step into the #litchat salon and introduce yourself. We’re chatting about THE FINE LINE BETWEEN FACT & FICTION.July 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
GraywolfPress RT @LitChat: Step into the #litchat salon and introduce yourself. We’re chatting about THE FINE LINE BETWEEN FACT & FICTION.July 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
VanessaDobbs Hi everybody looking forward to tonight’s chat #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LitChat If you have questions about THE FINE LINE BETWEEN FACT & FICTION, please send to @litchat w/o hashtag so l can post to #litchat.July 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
danish_novelist @LitChat I once wrote a novel based on my Jewish grand dad’s life. It was much closer to the truth than his own auto biography #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
Eugenia_Kim hello… torn between vacuuming or chatting. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana Twitter dropping posts now and then. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LitChat RT @BenRubinstein don’t understand why ppl get angry over fact/fiction?Is there anyone who really cares?Good writing is goodwriting #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
maggiedana @danish_novelist How did he react to your novel? Was he around to see it published? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
danish_novelist @BenRubinstein I got so mad when I discovered that Harry Potter wasn’t a memoire #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat Hallo! Twitter dropping posts?? *gasp* Unheard of! Ahem. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LitChat @maggiedana Yes, several of my tweets and others haven’t made the search feed. Will try to RP them. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LyndaDW I hate it when an author writes about a real person but adds things that didn’t happen. They should create a fictional character #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Sirenland @LitChat @BenRubinstein Non-Fiction (fact?) is much easier to market. People don’t like to feel lied to so others can sell #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
ecurbmp Hello #litchat! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Eugenia_Kim @danish_novelist: I believe my novel is similar. Sometimes fiction brings more truth, certainly more intimacy. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LitChat If you see RP preceding a tweet, it’s because it didn’t make the feed and I am RePosting (not the same as a RT). #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @mdbenoit Hi! Your post didn’t show up in TweetChat window. Am flipping between twitter and tweetchat to keep up. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
danish_novelist @maggiedana No, he had died. He was born in Palestine among camels but was abducted by a Danish missionary when he was 6 years old #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @danish_novelist So you’re saying the novel could e more objective about your granddad’s life? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
BenRubinstein @Eugenia_Kim Chat with us please! I talked up enough copies of Calligrapher’s at ALA to warrant it 😉 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat I’ll log onto Twitter too, to try to catch everyone. Tho it was dropping posts too, last time, as far as I could tell. *sigh* #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
SueCookcom Hello everyone – my first attendance #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LyndaDW thanks for letting me know the search is having problems. I thought I was doing it wrong #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @danish_novelist Wow, that’s amazing. Perfect fodder for a novel. What a history! What’s title of your novel about him? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
SueCookcom @maggiedana is tweetdeck ok to follow conversations #litchat?July 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom his sue – OK everyone, I’m in. Will keep as quiet as pos 🙂 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
Eugenia_Kim @BenRubinstein Yes, good writing; but when a book is sold as memoir or -ography, it promises more reporting than fiction #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
LindseyOConnor You asked for intro. I’m a journalist with a narrative nonfiction wip and a memoir. 4 prior books, but wips 1st in these genres. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @SueCookcom Hello Sue! Any old way to follow is great, long as it works! Twitter’s being a bit slow right now, so hang in there! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Eugenia_Kim Too many technical difficulties have chased me out of the room. Sorry! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
SueCookcom @rebeccawoodhead Hi Rebecca, I don’t think keeping quiet is what it’s all about 🙂 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
danish_novelist @Eugenia_Kim Novels can restore emotional life and put back the stuff a person has blocked out on purpose #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
Doublelattemama @danish_novelist was it marketed as a novel? Did u explain in either preface or afterward what was based in fact? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom I always get in trouble on litchat 🙂 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
CarolyBurnsBass @BenRubinstein I disagree with you. Consider James Frey’s “memoir” that was pure fiction. I don’t want to be manipulated like that. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead @maggiedana here… what are we chatting about? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
SueCookcom So what is the feeling about the fine line between fact and fiction. Aren’t we always told ‘write what you know’?! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
maggiedana Sue and I will help keep you in check! RT @rebeccawoodhead: @SueCookcom I always get in trouble on litchat 🙂 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
danish_novelist @maggiedana It’s “only” out in Danish and French. Le Reveur de Palestine (The Dreamer from Palestine) #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
maggiedana @rebeccawoodhead Topic: The Fine Line Between Fact and Fiction. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
SueCookcom @rebeccawoodhead This is my first so i’ll probably spell trouble too #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
iainbroome Hello – anyone able to tell me when it kicks off GMT? I always get timezone-confused with chats! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LindseyOConnor Fact or fiction: Poynter’s Roy Peter Clark said “If you say there’s a dog, I want there to have really been a dog.” I agree. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead @maggiedana right – Not usually a big fan of historical fiction so was really shocked at home much I loved Jamie Ford’s book #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead Still can’t get it in England – though you probably can on Amazon – Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LitChat Q1 fm @hangingnoodles Neuroscientists say brains not built to recall accurately. Are we never impartial observers? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat @LindseyOConnor Of course that has to allow for metaphors etc. There might “be a dog” in some other than literal sense & still true #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
SueCookcom After 25 years in journalism, I always spend rather too long on research instead of plunging into the story #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
ecurbmp Don’t we all put some fiction into our facts? Think the old game ‘Telephone’ and how a word could change with retelling. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @SueCookcom But your research has paid off. Your novels are spellbinding. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
danish_novelist @mdbenoit It was based on his own auto biography, diaries, and MY imagination. My first best seller in Denmark #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom All the writers & publishers are lovely. Don’t worry about punctuation either: exclamation marks = twitter glitter #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
RTjournalism RT @SueCookcom after 25 years in journalism, i always spend rather too long on research instead of plunging into the story #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from Retwittering |
SueCookcom @maggiedana Thanks – one review of my last book I got said i had done too much! ‘Too much science’ she said #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
maggiedana @iainbroome #litchat 9-10 GMT. On now.July 29, 2009 from web |
Doublelattemama @danish_novelist I’m writing a book this fall- same concept-amazing life, lots of missing pieces. Curious how much explaining u did #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom Jilly Cooper takes the same approach – research-wise #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat @SueCookcom I just can’t imagine there being “too much science.” <boggling> #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LindseyOConnor @SueCookcom Knowing when to quit researching and start writing’s always hard. Write early, but go back and forth as needed. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
latta #litchat look fwd to summary. twtr on bb difficult; chats close to impossible.July 29, 2009 from mobile web |
maggiedana @SueCookcom I disagree. I think you had a perfect blend of science and story. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LEEandLOW @SueCookcom Readers appreciate when writers do their research & document well. It’s a sign of respect for readers & for the story. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat Re Q1: I think we can’t recall entirely accurately. I still think we can come close, by various means. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
VanessaDobbs @LEEandLOW great point #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana RT @LEEandLOW: @SueCookcom Readers appreciate when writers do their research & document well. Sign of respect for readers & story. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
CarolyBurnsBass @SueCookcom I tend to research a topic to death, plus for me it’s also a great procrastination tactic. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Antoniablue @SueCookcom Way I look at it is, you can research say, a dentist, know nought about profession, but have similar life experiences. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
maggiedana Invoke the 5th? RT @kashicat: Re Q1: I think we cant recall entirely accurately. I still think we can come close, by various means. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
ecurbmp RP: Q1: Don’t we all put some fiction into our facts? Think the old game ‘Telephone’ and how a word could change with retelling. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TwitterFox |
SueCookcom @kashicat i@maggiedana it’s not poss to please everyone I guess. Insight to one person is tedium to another #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat I remember s/one saying Dorothy Dunnett never wrote ab. any place she hadn’t visited. Don’t know if true, but her bks read that way #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
VanessaDobbs @CarolyBurnsBass a tacticI used when writing my masters assignments #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Antoniablue #litchat for anyone interested. Discussion now.July 29, 2009 from web |
marybrebner @DYockman when they start lying..I mean making things up?~Oh, so true. Remember James Frey? Dude, it’s fiction. Just say it! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @mdbenoit True. Tho I think there can be *ways* of weaving science into story that makes it really good #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
danish_novelist @Doublelattemama It’s funny that fiction often can get closer to “truth” than some one’s memoire.#litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead I kind of revise the factual stuff first and it becomes the characters ‘thinking’ it after a while, then I go back and correct #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma Hey, everyone – research gives authors “spice” 4 story. Research can bog down author, slow writing, but not reading experience #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @CarolyBurnsBass Do you research to death bc. you’re worried there’ll be one fact you end up getting wrong? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
SueCookcom @Antoniablue Exactly – find out everything poss about the life of a dentist, then add the human stuff you know from own experience #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
George9Writer Changing facts into fiction (a gross oversimplification anyway) is where the art comes in. Bad memory makes better art? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
iainbroome I think it’s important to research thoroughly, but just as important to show restraint when you apply it in your work. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
marybrebner Freakin’ Twitter keeps eating my #litchat posts. Guess I’ll just read the transcript. Later!July 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma @danish_novelist – true! all stories worth fictionalizing a bit RE: fiction often can get closer to “truth” than memoir. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
Doublelattemama @danish_novelist I’m sure that’s true! I’ll have less 2 go on than u-no diary, no autobiography, but I’ll stay true 2 what I know #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
VanessaDobbs Mine too!RT @marybrebner: Freakin Twitter keeps eating my #litchat posts. Guess Ill just read the transcript. Later! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
CarolyBurnsBass @kashicat Yes, that’s certainly one of the reasons. Contributed by my graying brain. I must keep written records of everything. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom do you find you need to remove some of your fave details so the plot doesn’t suffer? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Antoniablue @SueCookcom Yeah. Eg: I may have been bitten by dog in the past (see I put dog in there!), & so might my dentist. Can tell truth. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma @kashicat @CarolyBurnsBass I’m currently researching my WIP to pieces. MUST back away from google & progress plot! #writegoal #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
maggiedana <— going to stick w/Twitter for #litchat, even if it makes me want to hurl laptop across room. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
SueCookcom Is doing so much research a sign of insecurity though? Should we just go wild with our imagination? Give it free reign? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LindseyOConnor @mdbenoit If you say a dog, I want there to be a dog, meaning lots readers want narrative & memoir to be factual. Literary but true #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from Nambu |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom I fight with my characters over it. I want my great research to be seen but they’re certain people want them first #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat Interesting. I’m seeing about 4-5 times # of posts on Twitter as on TweekDeck. Yet I can’t reply on Twitter. Grrrr. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
danish_novelist @wiremamma A noveli can put things into a larger perspective in a way that a memoir cannot #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
George9Writer @maggiedana Could be. Depends on how you use the words. Fiction is all about making up stories anyway. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
wiremamma @vanessadobbs @marybrebner – mine are disappearing as well. Hello! *taps mike* is this thing on? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead @George9Writer Hi! Brilliant work on the WIP! I think this is what I’m saying – need to learn it then put it aside #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Doublelattemama @wiremamma &it seems 2 me that some fictionalizing can draw focus to key points/theme-A portrayal of facts is hard to interpret #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
iainbroome @rebeccawoodhead Absolutely, taking bits out is the most difficult thing, but a complete necessity. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead RT @George9Writer …Fiction is all about making up stories anyway. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
SueCookcom @rebeccawoodhead I try to keep the fave details in if poss, but sometimes you have to ‘murder your babies’ and cut fave bits #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
100_indecisions @kashicat I def. do that–paranoid someone somewhere knows more about [tiny detail] than I do and will catch me not having a clue. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
George9Writer @rebeccawoodhead Thx Rebecca, and Hi! Yes, 82,500 words in a month. I need a health spa and a vacation. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
jkoyanagi @rebeccawoodhead Yes. It’s good to have the information stored away in my head, but I don’t want to bog down the reader. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma @iainbroome @rebeccawoodhead – don’t they call that “murdering your darlings” or something? plot progression is key. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom trickiest bit isn’t it? Hate that bit. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
maggiedana I wonder … do fiction writers tend to remove more researched details than do non-fiction writers? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
SueCookcom @Chadwickauthor Do you make sure you know your characters as if they were real before you start writing? Then let them grow #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @jkoyanagi @wiremamma @iainbroome with you on that #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
maggiedana @George9Writer 82k words in a month? That’s phenomenal. Amazing. D’you write fic or non-fic? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Anne_Frasier wonder if heartbreaking work of staggering genius would be considered memoir today? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma @george9writer – I’d be gibbering in a corner after 82k in amonth. well done. I have 30k to go by end of august! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
RebeccaMather #litchat just joining in. I’d like to write about Portugal. Never been there and likely won’t soon. Should that keep me from writing it?July 29, 2009 from web |
LindseyOConnor @George9Writer I’m in awe and envy of your word count. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
ibeforem #litchat I think memoirs *should* be vetted, because the reader makes an emotional commitment to a story when they believe it is true.July 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat @wiremamma Maybe just get it written, then fact-check during edit? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
Antoniablue @LindseyOConnor No, he would experiecne what I had, because I was bitten, so I know how it is. The story would be fictional though. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead @maggiedana He’s done brilliantly hasn’t he? Totally amazing. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma You never know when you’ll need it RT: @jkoyanagi information stored away in my head, but I don’t want to bog down the reader. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
danish_novelist @maggiedana Yes and they should. A novel should NEVER brag about its research. The story comes first #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
maggiedana @jkoyanagi Having that information in your head makes one’s writing richer, even if those details don’t make it to the page. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
iainbroome @maggiedana I imagine non-fiction is a different beast, but the research you include may depend on whether it’s an opinion piece. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
George9Writer @maggiedana I write novels. My first one’s “first draft” took four years or so; this one went a bit faster #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom – piggy-backing on your last q… My characters are the most important thing to me. I know EVERYTHING about them #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
RebeccaMather just joining in. I’d like to write about Portugal. Never been there and likely won’t soon. Should that keep me from writing it? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Antoniablue @LindseyOConnor Also, even if I hadn’t been bitten by dog, I had ferret hanging off finger, so could use that expeirence perhaps. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
100_indecisions @kashicat Spec genres are hard in their own right, but at least no one can say “I’ve been to [planet] & it doesn’t look like that!” #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
5M4B Madeleine L’Engle said that every nonfiction piece is part fiction, and all fiction has some truth. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from Seesmic |
danish_novelist @jkoyanagi Amen. Good research is never about impressing the reader. You merely want believability #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
SueCookcom @Chadwickauthor completely agree that research should be as invisible as possible in the story. Nowt worse than feeling lectured at #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat @RebeccaMather I’ve got same question about London where sequel to my 1st bk happens. Never been there. And 3rd bk wd be in India! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @RebeccaMather No!! You don’t need to murder someone to write about murder. At least… I hope not *looks around nervously* #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @RebeccaMather I’d think if non-fic, best to go to Portugal to research it; if fiction, then going there not so important. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
George9Writer @RebeccaMather One word re Portugal: RESEARCH #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
VanessaDobbs @RebeccaMather No! I’m told Stef Penney had never visited and tenderness of wolves was brilliant #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
pitchparlour @maggiedana For fiction writers, researched details are inspiration, for non-fiction writers, they are footnotes. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
George9Writer @LindseyOConnor Thanks Lindsey! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat @100_indecisions Heehee! That’s why I wrote fantasy stories so many yrs bf I had nerve to write “real world” story #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @kashicat Give it to a Londoner to read for accuracy – have a word with someone like @TamsynTweetie #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
CarolyBurnsBass @RebeccaMather Give it a try. Read everything you can similar to yours, then have yours read by others who know the area well. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LindseyOConnor @Antoniablue LOL #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma @doublelattemama – Agreed – if true memoir, how would you know how secondary characters are thinking/feeling? Tricky. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
RebeccaMather @George9Writer #litchat. That’s what I would rely most heavily on. And gorgeous photos.July 29, 2009 from web |
danish_novelist @RebeccaMather Of course. You can create your own Portugal. But if you’re a social realist you have to go. Great country! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma @rebeccawoodhead @rebeccamather – be careful about researching nefarious activities as well. Homeland security is watching. *wink* #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat @rebeccawoodhead I had an online friend from London who helped me with Tube stops that wd be abandoned some day #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
wiremamma Does anyone use GoogleEarth for research? I needed a perspective from a certain location. Didn’t even have to book a flight! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
George9Writer @JSColley Oh the obtusity! More acuity please! 😉 Janet, just do a Twitter search, use search term like #litchat or #writechatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @wiremamma argh! *eyes darting* #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat @rebeccawoodhead I feel same way ab. my characters. I live in their heads. I know them better than the world. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
RebeccaMather RebeccaMather@kashicat Beautiful!#litchat travel anywhere with research photos and imagination. Ideally love to actually be there though hm?July 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma @CarolyBurnsBass @RebeccaMather – I try to stay away from certain genres when I’m writing. dont want my voice tainted… thoughts? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LisaPietsch @wiremamma I use GoogleEarth all the time. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat @RebeccaMather I’d rather be there in person too. I’ll get help w/London, but by golly, I will *GO* to India bf bookk #3! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
danish_novelist @rebeccawoodhead Thank God that there’s this thing called imagination, or I wouldn’t want to hang out with horror writers #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead I’m pretty sure Emily Bronte never had a lusty run in with a bad man on the moors but she wrote an awesome Heathcliff #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma @rebeccawoodhead – big bro’s watching! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Doublelattemama @RebeccaMather I vote that u should write it anyway. Optimal solution is to go but u can interview, research, etc #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
maggiedana @wiremamma Am opposite. When writing (women’s fiction) I read lots of WF. Find it invigorating. Am careful to keep own voice, tho. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
jkoyanagi @wiremamma I admit to worrying about that from time to time, hah. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma @danish_novelist – I’m still not certain I want to hang out around horror authors. At least, not in the dark, or near cliffs. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Antoniablue @rebeccawoodhead Harsh, but necessary, I think. Realising what ISN’T relevant is so hard too, sometimes. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
George9Writer @wiremamma You’ll get there. Each book has its own pace. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
danish_novelist @wiremamma If you have a good voice it won’t disappear just because you read Dan Brown or the Bible #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @5M4B I’d think fiction has to have some elements of truth to be palatable, let alone enjoyable. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
iainbroome My novel is about caring for someone who’s had a stroke and I had no direct experience – it can be done! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
richardwiles @SueCookcom Hi Sue. Hope you’re well…I have numerous books in preparation that mix fact and historical fiction. I see no problem #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead @danish_novelist that’s what I’m saying – scary thought! Good thing there’s a concept called ‘fiction’ eh? 🙂 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
CarolyBurnsBass @wiremamma I stay away from certain genres all the time. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma @maggiedana – you have such a beautiful, clear voice — I doubt if you could ever sound like anyone else. 😉 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rottenperson @CarolyBurnsBass Like what? #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana Wow, thanks! RT @wiremamma: you have such a beautiful, clear voice — I doubt if you could ever sound like anyone else. 😉 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Vigorio I’ve always heard write what you know about. That’s why I do fantasy. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Antoniablue @iainbroome Course! And you’ll have cared for someone in different ways, love, sympathy, empathy, so you’ve a head start. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead @Antoniablue heartbreakingly so. This is why I always have a breakdown at the ‘tricky middle bit’ when my characters take over #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma Elements of truth are what season good writing @kashicat – I just need to remember that and keep going with WIP. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat RT @danish_novelist: Thank God that there’s this thing called imagination, or I wouldn’t want to hang out with horror writers #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LitChat RT @20xJENNY: Ultimately the author is responsible for stating whether his/her story is fact or fiction. –more– #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
wiremamma @maggiedana – no problem. I got your back. 😉 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
pussreboots @wiremamma Tainted how? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
RebeccaMather @wiremama and @rebeccawoodhead lol! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
LisaRomeo @wiremamma In nonfic, want to stay in narrator’s head, not wander into another’s mind, unless understood it’s only what narr THINKS #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
George9Writer @RebeccaMather Research may well include going there, even living there. Look at William T Vollmann’s level of research #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
Doublelattemama @wiremamma depends on point of view-3rd person doesn’t necessarily know what everybodys thinking- sometimes all we know are actions #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
iainbroome I recently blogged about writing without upsetting friends and family – has anyone had to dodge this metaphorical bullet? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
danish_novelist @wiremamma The most poisonous writers are the sickly sweet ones. The dark ones get it out in their writing. they’re pussycats #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rottenperson @LitChat Or something in between? #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana RT @aecbks RT @jennybent: Writers: try ending each chapter with a cliff hanger. Works for most any kind of fiction. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
RebeccaMather #litchat Oh I’m writing about what I know right now my friends and it’s not all that pretty 🙂 let’s just say “potty-training” lol!July 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma @pussreboots – After research for _All or Nothing_ & immersing in history of Am. west, I stopped reading anything and just wrote. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
CarolyBurnsBass @rottenperson I don’t enjoy genre fiction written with specific forumlas in mind. You can probably figure out what types I mean. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
linc0lnpark @danish_novelist Yeah! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rottenperson @maggiedana Works with nonfiction, too. We’re all in the entertainment business. #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Antoniablue @iainbroome Not dodged yet but would say any similarities completely coincidental. I’d forgotten about you bashing pet etc etc. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
bridelines #litchat looking 4 literary agent for nonfiction humor book. please contact bridelines if you know anyone with interestJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead @kashicat tweetchat dropped tweets just found.. Don’t you love living in their heads? I always resist for a bit but then it’s magic #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
Best_Books #litchat if a biography/autobiography has embellished stories do we really care? Do we require such memoirs to b reliable historical source?July 29, 2009 from web |
spacemonkeygaz @iainbroome My novel is about a rock star who has an affair with a glamour model, and I had no direct experience – it can be done! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rottenperson @CarolyBurnsBass Me, too. But they’re good to study if you’re a writer, yes? #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @rottenperson Good point. Those cliffhanger endings are what keep me turning page of non-fic even when I know the outcome! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LitChat RP @LitChat: RT @20xJENNY: –cont– How could Rosenblat’s editor have known? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat @rebeccawoodhead I can’t really even start writing story, most of the time, if I’m not living in head of at least 1 character #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
George9Writer Re Memoirs, vetting facts: as a writer I found the level of dishonesty in a certain “memoir” to be deplorable, likely a media stunt #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
UnionSqPress @Best_Books If stories = embellished, that must be acknowledged. Authors notes are great ways of setting up the “rules” for the bk. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
SueCookcom @RebeccaMather Lucky you! My kids flown nest now, but I’m the poorer for material! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
CarolyBurnsBass @rottenperson Eek. I did my study, now I’ve moved on. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma @doublelattemama – true. but in 3rd person, you can change characters POV from one chapter to next #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rottenperson @Best_Books Deciding what to leave in and what to take out is one thing; embellishing may be something else. #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @SueCookcom Grandchildren will (I promise) provide much fodder for fiction. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
QcattQ @Best_Books I EXPECT biography/ autobiography to include embellished stories. Bit boring otherwise. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LindseyOConnor @UnionSqPress @Best_Books Give me authors notes w/your “rules” and I’ll follow you anywhere. Lie (embellished if I don’t know) grrr #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma @lisaRomeo – in Nonfic – you still can shift characters, yes? Honestly, I read mostly fiction unless it’s reference books. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead @kashicat I fight it out until I’m in their heads, then I edit ‘as’ them – if they wouldn’t say it, it goes. I’m brutal. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
SueCookcom Bowing out now – really enjoyed the last hour x #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
linc0lnpark @UnionSqPress a disclaimer, so to speak… #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LitChat Trying again– RT @20xJENNY: –cont– How could Rosenblat’s editor have known? #litchat #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
RebeccaMather @SueCookcom Thank you! 🙂 it is lots of fun isn’t it. #litchat #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @Doublelattemama I’ll look into tweetgrid. Thanks for tip. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
20xJenny Even facts are open to interpretation. Two differing biographies on Harry Truman in college taught me how to think critically. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
Vigorio If I read a bio I want it to be all truth – nothing embellished. That sounds like lying. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead @SueCookcom thanks for chatting. Bye for now 🙂 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat @rebeccawoodhead You must find that they take over the story too, right? Sometimes take it where they want to go, rather than you? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rottenperson @LindseyOConnor Yeah, and the rules better be posted at the entrance, not exit. #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
CarolyBurnsBass @UnionSqPress Embellishment is an element of good writing, fiction or non. Falsehoods are another story entirely. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Doublelattemama @wiremamma you absolutely can – just pointing out that u don’t necessarily have to be in the head of everybody #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
RebeccaMather @20xJenny I agree. I think we all see through our own lense. Our own experience and that’s largely where we write from. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead @kashicat – oh yeah! My characters ruin my life. I lose all ownership of the story but it’s not mine, it’s theirs so… fair enough #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat @20xJenny That was why I mentioned on Monday that we almost have to read several bios of same person, to get near full perspective #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
Doublelattemama If novel is based loosely on fact, 1) would u explain it to reader? 2) if so, where-preface or epilogue? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat @rebeccawoodhead What I find, with my char’s, is that the direction they want to go is usually better than my plan. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
CarolyBurnsBass @LitChat When memoirs have such a miraculous coincidence as Rosenblat’s, I think an editor should do some fact checking. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead @kashicat like I said, aside from the odd sub-plot I guide the plot until the mid-point then there’s a big scrap between me & them #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LindseyOConnor @rottenperson Entrance rules make me love you. Exit rules like you. No rules, suspect you. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
LitChat We’ve come to the end of our posted hour of #litchat. Feel free to continue the convo, but come back on Friday at 4 p/et.July 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
StackedBlog @best_books Biography, for posterity, yes, we care. Autobios & memoirs are tainted by personal bias which is to be expected. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
LisaRomeo @linc0lnpark I know what you mean. Well then I guess “lie becomes truth” huh? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
UnionSqPress @LindseyOConnor Ex: my aus of a crime bk are clear about parts of the case where no one knows the truth & explain their conjectures #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
Best_Books @Vigorio wot do u consider embellisment-authors may not make up story bt can they really remember intricacies of childhood events? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
RebeccaMather @kashicat @rebeccawoodhead What I find, with my char’s, is that the direction they want to go is usually better than my plan.#litchat I likeJuly 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma RT: @kashicat @rebeccawoodhead What I find, with my char’s, is that the direction they want to go is usually better than my plan. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rottenperson @LindseyOConnor Sounds like a dating service Web site. Sorry. #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
kashicat @RebeccaMather But don’t you think we can write s/o else’s experience bc we’ve got imagination? We’re writers, after all. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead it’s the same for characters – they change so they have to call it #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
UnionSqPress @CarolyBurnsBass Agree. Embellishment creates flavor. But it must stem from solid research and not purely invention of details. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @Vigorio Oh yes! It’s the kind of “filler” chars I put in sometimes who become crucial to whole plot, that I love. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rottenperson @LindseyOConnor P.S. But in a good way. #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rottenperson @Best_Books All an author has to do is say, “as I recall…” #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
linc0lnpark @LisaRomeo Linear thinking seems more of a moot point in a world where lines are rarely straight, IMHO… you know? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
20xJenny @kashicat completely agree + also with your RT: I mean, all our historical sources are written from “a pt of view” #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
rebeccawoodhead when you plan your life you’re not the person you were when you reach each point so you only know if the plot works when you arrive #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
Vigorio @rottenperson but shouldn’t the basis for the story be provable with facts? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Best_Books @UnionSqPress at what level do u declare story is embellished ?Must u admit that conversations not exact/scenary not remembered? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma RT: @rottenperson @Best_Books All an author has to do is say, “as I recall…” #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
rebeccawoodhead it’s the same for characters – they change so they have to call it #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
LitChat RP: On Friday @rottenperson aka Gary Buslik joins us as guest host. Save your questions for him on Friday, 4-5 p/et in #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma @rebeccawoodhead – I guess that’s why writing is rewriting, huh? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
20xJenny @RebeccaMather So true. That’s why Mary Karr’s LIAR’S CLUB is one of my all-time favorites. Love her lens. (oops) #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
LindseyOConnor @UnionSqPress Love your example. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from Nambu |
Best_Books #litchat @kashicat absolutely – biogs etc only 1 source among many and therefore embellishment to a certain degree is presumed in some form.July 29, 2009 from web |
rottenperson Have to sign out now. Look forward to guest hosting on Friday. You’re a terrific group. #LitChatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
wiremamma Great chat everyone! Nice to see you all… #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
maggiedana @rottenperson Looking forward to seeing you again. Bye! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
alexisgrant Sorry to pop in midstream, but what’s the #litchat topic?July 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @rottenperson See ya later! #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
Best_Books #litchat @QcattQ exactly – comes back 2 the point that book must be entertaining & stories chosen and told for maximum readership potentialJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @rebeccawoodhead Ha! Well done. 🙂 #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
alexisgrant Ooops! Missed #litchat. Next time!July 29, 2009 from web |
UnionSqPress @Best_Books Another recent ex: COVERT, about infiltrating the mob, has a note about how undercover officers are trained to recall. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
rebeccawoodhead @wiremamma yep. I used to be a singer though and there’s something about that first ‘take’ – happens in writing too #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
UnionSqPress @Best_Books COVERT doesn’t have endnotes, so we found a way to explain how the author remembered as much as he did: It was his job. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
RebeccaMather Great to connect with all of you. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
20xJenny RT @RebeccaMather: Great to connect with all of you. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
UnionSqPress @LindseyOConnor Thanks! And now I’m signing out of #litchat. Off to edit!July 29, 2009 from web |
linc0lnpark Without embellishment, there would be no HOUSE OF LEAVES, for example. It is a dirty thing that can be a jewel in the right hands. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
iainbroome I’m not sure about ‘planning’ characters. Have a good profile and a narrative for them to live in, but feel free to let them wander #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
Best_Books #litchat i know this coversation has ended-and sorry for late arrival-but do we think politicians memoirs for e.g really tell whole truth…July 29, 2009 from web |
VeggieV @QcattQ hi hon! did you enjoy that flourish into wed #litchat?July 29, 2009 from web |
wiremamma @rebeccawoodhead – rewrites get easier the more we write, yes? We all want a clean “first take” but must keep fingers “singing” #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @20xJENNY This isn’t to say I disbelieve in objective knowledge. I just think it takes lots of research about events. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
BenRubinstein @CarolyBurnsBass But drama, which is the same in fiction/memoir, is what appeals. What’s the difference? #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
20xJenny @kashicat I hear you. My favorite historians use a balance of primary sources–mostly quotes, and often opposing views. More #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat @20xJENNY Hee! Double post, there. But yes — that’s what I like. A rounded approach, w/as much primary background as possible. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
kashicat @20xJENNY This was why I loved John Romer’s early Egypt documentaries — packed w/good research. Unlike Hist. Channel dreck today #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
herstorian Missed #litchat because I read the time wrong. Catching up now.July 29, 2009 from web |
kashicat @20xJENNY They seem to cater to lowest common denominator. Plus most sensationalist stuff. Demeaning, & very popular. Ugh. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetDeck |
CarolyBurnsBass @BenRubinstein Drama can be achieved in good narrative non-fiction and memoir while still maintaining truth. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from TweetChat |
herstorian @UnionSqPress If stories = embellished, that must be acknowledged. Authors notes are gr8 ways of setting up the “rules” for the bk. #litchatJuly 29, 2009 from web |
FredRamey #litchat. Too late. I wanted to say A figure in a memoir I pubbed long ago asked “Is it true?” The author said “Well, it’s not Rashomon.”July 29, 2009 from web |
Comments»
No comments yet — be the first.